![]() I pitty anyone who bought a British car on their recommendation at times when British cars were the least reliable and durable on the market, with the exception of French cars, also an editorial favorite, and it is too bad for loyal readers who missed out on the joys of German cars due to often luke warm reviews, or who missed out on some of the better American car offerings due to R&T bias that goes back to the day when they were formed as a journal for people seeking an alternative to the US establishment. The end result is that their opinions are of negative value to car shoppers. ![]() ![]() While Car and Driver has periods of apparent bias, and a current trend towards being one big compendium of advertising quote fodder(when is the last time they gave a vehicle a really negative review?), Road & Track has managed to hold onto a pattern of consistent bias for the 27 years I've been reading them. The articles by Sam Posey in recent years have justified the subscription price for me, but I read Car and Driver to keep up with the new vehicle offerings. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |